If you want to become a reviewer for the ECAI conference and to be included in the TPC of the edition, then I invite you to send to office@ecai.ro your agreement and the ECAI topics (keywords – optional, number of papers for review – optional) in which you want to receive papers (maximum 5 papers, if the reviewer not mention a different number).
Important Notice Regarding the Preparation of Scientific Paper Reviews – Prohibition of Using Generative AI Tools
All reviewers are hereby informed that the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies – such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or other similar tools – is not permitted in the preparation of reviews for scientific papers submitted to the conference.
According to the official guidelines, reviewers must provide a detailed commentary justifying the scores given. Both the score and the review text are required. A minimum of 500 words is recommended to ensure constructive feedback, and this limit becomes mandatory when the recommendation is to reject the paper.
At the end of the evaluation process, each reviewer must explicitly confirm the following:
“I confirm that I did not use any generative artificial intelligence tools or AI-assisted technological methods to prepare this reviewer report. The review report was prepared solely by myself, based on my own evaluation and writing.”
This declaration is mandatory and constitutes a personal commitment. ECAI Teams reserves the right to conduct investigations and retract any reviews found to have been generated using automated text-generation tools. Any breach of these rules may result in disciplinary consequences, including removal from the list of reviewers or invalidation of the contribution to the scientific evaluation process.
This measure is intended to safeguard academic integrity, the objectivity of the peer-review process, and the scientific quality of the feedback provided to authors.
We kindly ask you to strictly adhere to these requirements and actively contribute to maintaining an ethical and professional academic environment.
In the overall evaluation that is sent to the authors during the paper review phase, in addition to the strengths (practical relevance, technical depth, etc.), include the identified weaknesses and constructive recommendations (concrete, based on the content of the paper; do not include an analysis based on general recommendations provided by artificial intelligence programs), which can be resolved by the authors within 6 days (this is the response period; if there are too many recommendations in the areas of content improvement that cannot be resolved in a timely manner by the authors, rejection is recommended).In the confidential remarks for the program committee, include the main reasons for rejecting the paper.
A waiver (100% discount) for the electronic sessions of the current ECAI edition will be granted to the reviewer who will evaluate 10 papers for the current ECAI edition or who has 10 reviews accumulated from previous 2 ECAI editions (ECAI-2024, ECAI-2025) and who did not benefit from this waiver on ECAI-2025.
Since the ECAI conference is organized in person for Romanian authors (they can receive acceptance for the electronic session if they cannot attend the conference for objective reasons), then reviewers from Romania will receive a waiver for the second or third paper in which they appear as a co-author.
Organizers message
Contactează-ne:
Sună-ne la:
+40 123 123 123
E-mail:
biurou@domeniul-tău.ro